-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Martin Husemann wrote:

>On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 05:59:19PM +0200, Jaromir Dolecek wrote:
>> While we are at it, please rename the PF-specific spamd to pf-spamd or
>> similar.
>
>I can see what name clash you are trying to avoid here, but note that this
>spamd should not be pf specific (it should be easy to extend it to support
>ipf). So maybe do not make the name too pf centric.

I don't particularly mind if the name is pfspamd or something else, but 
the name `spamd' is also the name of a _much_ more widely used product 
which we distribute through pkgsrc, so the name shouldn't be `spamd' in 
any case... :-)

- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCWVNBpRpI6SYACmIRArd8AJ98K36razzeZPA/VncN8YYTb6t9VgCdGqWw
3rxiNlkubwprgdMupchs4X8=
=+bCL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----