-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:

>> I have a real problem with it -- it should not be $PATH-dependent 
>> whether typing `spamd' starts the daemon which could be necessary to 
>> mail delivery or some other barely-spam-related daemon.
>
>well, does your PATH include /usr/libexec?
>is it a common usage?

Look, I know you're interested in winning the argument at this point, 
but are you _really_ arguing that it's _good_ practice to have two 
different binaries with the same name but completely different functions 
on the system?

Really?

I mean that doesn't even pass the laugh test -- just look at all the 
confusion the difference between banner(1) and banner(6) have caused 
over the years, and those aren't even programs people use almost any of 
the time...

- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCWpHfpRpI6SYACmIRAuAPAKDIs1aBYtE0ZHENdcoJCDYCQ53KpwCfRWfI
Mt056UD4M8XFQztihM+5j9Y=
=hHOu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----