> >i can understand why you want to rename it.
> >however, i don't think it's worth to do.
> 
> You keep saying this, but you haven't actually told us why you think it
> is not worth it.  You've made vague noises about `conflicts', but that's
> all.

well, i've tried to explain why i think so.
sorry if it just yields noises to you.

> I've just done this.  spamd is now pfspamd.  spamdb is now pfspamdb.  
> spamd-setup is now pfspamd-setup.  There _were_ no changes required to 
> the code.  Period.

ignoring Martin Husemann's suggestion?
and you will need to change the code later as you admitted the below?

> Tomorrow morning, I will be committing changes to pfspamd to use 
> /etc/pfspamd.conf and /var/chroot/pfspamd, and to rename spamlogd to 
> pfspamlogd, for consistency.  This requires two lines of 
> changed code under src/dist/pf.

don't forget about usage(), syslog ident, service name, group name, etc.

> If you would like, I hereby volunteer 
> to resolve any and all conflicts which spring up in those two lines.

good to hear.  please feel free to add yourself to doc/RESPONSIBLE.

YAMAMOTO Takashi