On Jun 17, 2005, at 3:36 PM, James Chacon wrote:

> Does it violate the principle of least surprise that the compiler  
> is deciding
> to call entirely different functions for me because it decided that  
> was
> "optimal" when all I did was specify -O2 or -O3?

It doesn't matter how much it surprises you, because in this specific  
case, the behavior is undefined.

-- thorpej