On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:55:56PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Christoph Kaegi wrote:
> >So the statfs -> stavfs change went in at 299000900 ?
> 
> No.

No, but using your check would make it fail on 2.1.

Go back to the mailing list archive for tech-pkg and search for problems
with using 200040000 for the statvfs check.

or http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=31138

To make it easier we use 299000900. If someone really wants to stay
with 2.0D-2.0H then it will lose, but that is his problem.

Bernd