On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 07:36:46PM -0600, David Young wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 08:22:48PM +0100, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> > 
> > Hm... I would have thought that openbgpd is a candidate for pkgsrc, not
> > for base.
> 
> It would be a shame to squander openbgpd's *.mk-based build and
> cross-buildability by putting it into pkgsrc instead of into base.

I tend to agree.  With syspkg so close to working, I think this is
precisely the sort of thing that should go into /usr/src though quite
possibly not into the traditional base.tgz tar file.