--2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 12:14:36AM -0400, der Mouse wrote:
> > [indent(1) vs //-to-nl comments]
>=20
> > Any thoughts?
>=20
> Ummm...sed -e 's@//.*@/* & */@'?  Bit of a kludge, but then, what are
> C++ comments doing in supposedly-C code anyway?

As others have noted, they are now valid. :-)

I have also found that they are also occasionally very convenient. :-)

So any thoughts on this?

Take care,

Bill

--2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFEWSzTWz+3JHUci9cRAhDrAJ0Q07TYo733B1HG01t6sNEvHJdnJwCffHcA
NyujiawID+Ll0/eTROTe1Fo=
=eYyU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs--