On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 03:40:16PM +0200, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> >That's good point. People might have to install them to get a security
> >fix (before it's part of a release) and won't like their system as
> >being marked as an unstable version becaose of that.
> 
> Aren't there RCs for the security branches?  If there are the rename
> of STABLE to PATCH might not solve this issue.  (I sincelery don't
> know.)

We (release engineering) haven't done RCs for patch releases in the past
because it was never necessary.

	Kind regards

-- 
Matthias Scheler                                  http://scheler.de/~matthias/