--J/BDJo4Yjy3b8E62
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 04:31:54PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 04:07:01PM +0200, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> > It's a bug in distrib/sets/sets.subr:  it calls ${MAKE} without
> > clearing MAKEFLAGS, so it interprets the -J although the parent of
> > sets.subr isn't aware of that instance of make(1).
>=20
> I don't claim to understand the inner workings of make, but is it realy
> necessary that -J shows up in MAKEFLAGS at all? It is kind of an internal
> argument, so keeping it out of the variable sounds like a good thing.

But how is it supposed to go to a child instance of make, then?
I don't claim to understand anything about make, let alone its inner
workings :)

Note:  jumping to tech-userlevel.

--=20
Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org
"When I find the controls, I'll go where I like, I'll know where I want
to be, but maybe for now I'll stay right here on a silent sea."
KT Tunstall, Silent Sea, Eye to the Telescope, 2004.

--J/BDJo4Yjy3b8E62
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBROXQwtgoQloHrPnoAQJrXAf/bjbUmgqdLCEHzi2Gkpk5E2iODRYZpqp8
d5SCC2Kp1sEUoUwwWQwNnGMUckXbqpRr6zrTSGlv+M95eB4L/+2Bmsk6zamaI9MX
2MeYwa15JRB/VR21AWM15nRgDbCYPawIfoJg6gYW86opAEsqTa6lSbpyzH7OQujY
+uT88LYYpJDKhfC/DF0vZJ8ta5sGaWE6uNzY8dyaOfda9VWcWmP71wRteC7kJ+wL
87KB/zTv+rwT9EQXi8RFXqS0eyDXTjp3aCWm0cVxgoK/DkXWIsu//pWr1aZYMQPt
QnnJRnyp3L1dvfySi9dMb51KbgdI35R8VMM41o7a1laeJFF8mnaGKg==
=ZLZZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--J/BDJo4Yjy3b8E62--