Subject: Re: swapoff=YES as default? (was Re: Additional swap/dump magic)
To: Alan Barrett <apb@cequrux.com>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 08/29/2006 21:47:44
--/d7X7C0hV/blnKmH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 11:27:00AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> > There was
> > a discussion a while back about shutdown hook ordering that is
> > relevant here, where swap, raid, cgd, etc devices might be stacked in
> > different orders.
>=20
> I still think that shutdown hooks would be the right solution.  See
> <http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2005/05/09/0001.html> for my
> proposal.

Yup, I agree, and that's exactly the discussion I was referring to, thanks.

--
Dan.
--/d7X7C0hV/blnKmH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFE9ClgEAVxvV4N66cRAtwXAKDmGgovVD4VgD398MTfO7fRPdazkgCgvsIc
QRUjOTD3jjlcyIoFo2GrpSY=
=E39n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/d7X7C0hV/blnKmH--