On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 07:06:24PM +0100, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> 
> As I've said to Pavel and a number of people, I'm actually of the
> opinion that we should go with ksh, despite the fact that I've never
> used it as a login shell, and will probably never use it either.

I think that's a bad idea because to anyone who _is_ used to ksh --
real ksh -- as a login shell, our ksh clearly doesn't cut it.

Thor