YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2006/09/16/0060.html
>>
>> That is nearly 14 minute run-time compared with less than a second,
>> generated on my 2ghz/1gb ram amd64 machine. There is no way we are going
>> back to maintain a shell script.
> 
> the most time-consuming (and poorly written) part of fpgen.sh seems
> the code to exclude hardlinks.  the C version doesn't seem to do it.
> is it intentional?

no; see other running thread on this list. :)

-e.

-- 
Elad Efrat