SODA Noriyuki <soda@sra.co.jp> writes:
>       "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> said:
>
>>> So, we now reached the conclusion that current implementation
>>> shouldn't have the name "-rm". Right?
>
>> Only if it should not have the name "-delete" either. :)
>
> Why?
> It seems your opinion is:
> either
>   1. "-rm" option should do what people expect.
>     and "-delete" option should be renamed.

I'd be happy enough with "-rm" should do what people expect and
"-delete" can stay as it is, though I would prefer that both do what
people expect.

Meanwhile, I would like the documentation to reflect the behavior
accurately.

-- 
Perry E. Metzger		perry@piermont.com