Subject: Re: definition of TRUE and FALSE in system headers
To: None <tech-userlevel@netbsd.org>
From: Luke Mewburn <lukem@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 07/24/2007 09:26:38
--YIwHDYD8sUXtBKvt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:07:13PM -0000, De Zeurkous wrote:
| I'm perfectly aware of that. Doesn't it make sense to define TRUE and
| FALSE there first and then define true and false as their uppercase
| equivalents?
No, it doesn't make sense given that it would introduce unnecessary
namespace pollution. Which was the point of the original thread.
--YIwHDYD8sUXtBKvt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFGpTkupBhtmn8zJHIRAhGCAKDKpe8toJSnzk4lH2PBKjxSd6db9wCdGS8G
lV0OS8nI7l1MDp0KH+0Q//E=
=rWVH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--YIwHDYD8sUXtBKvt--