On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:55:32PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> At Fri, 05 Oct 2007 17:58:48 -0400, I wrote:
> Subject: Re: Compiling NetBSD with another compiler.
> > 
> > It would still probably be worth the effort to figure out the status of
> > ditroff and if/how it could be properly open-sourced.  Maybe the AST
> > toolkit folks could help.
> 
> I keep forgetting about Plan 9 and the fact it is now open source.
> 
> Probably the best and most up-to-date version of ditroff _is_ open
> sourced, and it _is_ the most recent full DWB code (modified as
> necessary to port it to Plan 9, of course, including full Unicode
> support):

Oh, this is fantastic.  What is Plan 9's current license?

Thor