Subject: Re: lib/37473
To: None <gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 12/04/2007 11:28:23
Christos said:
<quote>
Well, this is the way OS/X went, and it was a bitch for me to
bootstrap the emulation code because I could not build a statically
linked binary. Trying to get the emulation going with a dynamically
linked binary was a pain in the ass because too much stuff needed to
go right before I even started executing main(). Yes, this is a
limited case and I agree with you that we should make .a's optional in
the install, but I would hate to completely lose the ability to
produce statically linked binaries like OS/X has. There are still a
few corner cases (installers, standalone programs) that can benefit
from static linking.
</quote>
I didn't suggest removing the ability to make static binaries. "De-
support" doesn't mean "make it not work". It does mean, however,
"don't bother putting effort into it".
-- thorpej