Re: systat -- any reason to support crash dumps?

[Simon Burge <simonb%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

Christos Zoulas wrote:

> In article <D7BDFC26-04EB-47B0-A88F-26C462FB8D90%shagadelic.org@localhost>,
> Jason Thorpe  <thorpej%shagadelic.org@localhost> wrote:
> >systat is a tool that is fundamentally structured around providing  
> >live stat updates on a running system.  If I were to convert some of  
> >its modules to use sysctl to get data instead, is there any reason to  
> >even conditionally use kvm to read the same data?
> 
> I don't see one.

Me neither.  Is there any data that systat can display that the other
grovellers can't get (and if so, anything that's vaguely useful)?

Cheers,
Simon.