tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: mail.local NSS awareness



In article <1ig71rb.10m13b1agedd5M%manu%netbsd.org@localhost>,
Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
>Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> wrote:
>
>> A better patch may be to use getpwnam_r(), which explicitely
>> "return 0 on success or entry not found, and non-zero on failure".
>
>Something like this, then?
>
>diff -U 4 -r1.23 mail.local.c
>--- mail.local.c        27 Sep 2006 17:15:20 -0000      1.23
>+++ mail.local.c        30 Apr 2008 02:53:27 -0000
>@@ -56,8 +56,9 @@
> #include <string.h>
> #include <syslog.h>
> #include <time.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
>+#include <sysexits.h>
> 
> #include "pathnames.h"
> 
> #define        FATAL           1
>@@ -180,21 +181,33 @@
>        char *name;
>        int lockfile;
> {
>        struct stat sb;
>-       struct passwd *pw;
>+       struct passwd pwres, *pw;
>+       char pwbuf[1024];
>        int created, mbfd, nr, nw, off, rval=0, lfd=-1;
>        char biffmsg[100], buf[8*1024], path[MAXPATHLEN],
>lpath[MAXPATHLEN];
>        off_t curoff;
> 
>        /*
>         * Disallow delivery to unknown names -- special mailboxes can
>be
>         * handled in the sendmail aliases file.
>         */
>-       if (!(pw = getpwnam(name))) {
>-               err(NOTFATAL, "unknown name: %s", name);
>-               return(1);
>+       if ((getpwnam_r(name, &pwres, pwbuf, sizeof(pwbuf), &pw)) != 0)
>{
>+               switch (errno) {
>+               case EAGAIN:
>+               case ETIMEDOUT:
>+                       err(EX_TEMPFAIL, "unknown name: %s", name);
>+                       break;
>+               default:
>+                       err(EX_UNAVAILABLE, "unknown name: %s", name);
>+                       break;
>+               }
>+               /* NOTREACHED */
>+                return(1);
>        }
>+       if (pw == NULL)
>+               err(EX_OK, "unknown name: %s", name);

Shouldn't the last err be errx? Also can't we avoid using default: and
enumerate the possible errnos?

christos



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index