Rainer Gerhards schrieb:
So it might be necessary to introduce a new IP-delimiter like in @@[10.1.2.3]:514 and @@[2001:db8::1428:57ab]:514I really like this proposal - it makes it quite simple for me to handle the changed option position (above) as a side-effect. Looking at this, we may even go back to a single @ as @[ would be the actual cookie for "non plain old UDP forwarding". What do you think?
Yes, I agree. So the format for TLS-destinations now looks like this: @[server.example.net] @[2001:db8::1428:57ab](subject="server.example.net") @[server.example.net]:514(fingerprint="SHA1:E4:E1:A6:1C:D4:31:D7:D4:9B:B8:DC:DF:DD:CE:30:71:46:00:92:C9") It is also possible to use service names: @[server.example.net]:syslogThis also implies that UDP destinations do not get an additional port option. (Or at least not if they are given as an IPv6.)
-- Martin