tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: int vs. long in test(1)

To: tech-userlevel%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: int vs. long in test(1)
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:48:53 +0200

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 02:39:46PM -0700, James Chacon wrote:
> Yes, conversion to intmax_t should do it. Would be nice to be consistent 
> across all platforms though. Do all of them define this as "long long"/64 
> bit?

Until we get 128bit support in the compiler, yes.

Joerg

References:
- int vs. long in test(1)
  - From: Thomas Klausner
- Re: int vs. long in test(1)
  - From: Alan Barrett
- Re: int vs. long in test(1)
  - From: James Chacon
- Re: int vs. long in test(1)
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: int vs. long in test(1)
  - From: James Chacon
- Re: int vs. long in test(1)
  - From: Quentin Garnier
- Re: int vs. long in test(1)
  - From: James Chacon

Prev by Date: Re: int vs. long in test(1)
Next by Date: Re: int vs. long in test(1)
Previous by Thread: Re: int vs. long in test(1)
Next by Thread: Re: int vs. long in test(1)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index