tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: [PATCH 4/6] apply proper value for _POSIX_SAVED_IDS

To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] apply proper value for _POSIX_SAVED_IDS
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:05:17 -0400

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 06:02:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> The _POSIX_SAVED_IDS shoud be greater than zero always as required by SUSv3.

I do not believe we actually implement POSIX_SAVED_IDS.  It's an optional
feature... and in the opinion of many, a very poorly designed one.

Thor

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] apply proper value for _POSIX_SAVED_IDS
  - From: Andy Shevchenko

References:
- [PATCH 1/6] fix ambiguous errno treating after mktime()
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH 2/6] put proper value to the _POSIX_TZNAME_MAX
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH 3/6] apply proper value for _POSIX_JOB_CONTROL
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH 4/6] apply proper value for _POSIX_SAVED_IDS
  - From: Andy Shevchenko

Prev by Date: [PATCH 5/6] setup _POSIX2_C_BIND constant
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/6] apply proper value for _POSIX_SAVED_IDS
Previous by Thread: Re: [PATCH 6/6] fdopen() opens successfully more descriptiors than STREAM_MAX
Next by Thread: Re: [PATCH 4/6] apply proper value for _POSIX_SAVED_IDS
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index