Re: groff/-mandoc replacement

[markucz%gmail.com@localhost]

> There was a very recent conversation about another reason to replace gproff,
> which was to avoid C++ so the userland could be compiled with pcc.
> 
> Just about the right time. Interesting!

Some time ago I wondered whether I could replace groff with 4.4BSD's roff. It
seems there're no licensing issues (that was the only thing bothering me).
Later I discovered MirBSD was using it already. pcc compiles it without any
problems, too.

Best regards.