Re: Issues with FFS vs UFS name in applications and documentation

[Luke Mewburn <lukem%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:54:39PM -0400, der Mouse wrote:
  | >     The source code organisation in src/sys/ufs implies a common
  | >     code-base called "ufs", with more specific implimentations of
  | >     "ffs" (Berkeley Fast File System), "ext2fs" (Linux ext2), "lfs"
  | >     (Berkeley Log-structured File System), (etc.)
  | 
  | Isn't that at least roughly correct, for the kernel source level (which
  | is what the code in src/sys/ is)?  There's a moderate amount of code
  | that's shared there (the stuff in sys/ufs/ufs).

Yes. I wasn't implying that the source code layout was incorrect.
I was using the source code layout as a data point.

Attachment: pgpvKqkA6C2LC.pgp
Description: PGP signature