Hi all, On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost> wrote: > int snprintbx(char *buf, size_t buflen, const char *fmt, u_quad_t *val); > wouldn't the C99 `uint64_t' variant be more desirable than `u_quad_t' ? - Arnaud