tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: SCRIPTS v FILES

To: markucz%gmail.com@localhost
Subject: Re: SCRIPTS v FILES
From: David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:02:20 +0000

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 08:46:12AM +0300, markucz%gmail.com@localhost wrote:
 > > -FILES=         c89.sh
 > > +SCRIPTS=       c89.sh
 > > [...]
 > 
 > Would this result in having c[89]9.sh in /usr/bin? I think the names c89 and
 > c99 are more intuitive.

Nope. With SCRIPTS the suffix is stripped off.

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- SCRIPTS v FILES
  - From: Aleksej Saushev
- Re: SCRIPTS v FILES
  - From: markucz

Prev by Date: Re: SCRIPTS v FILES
Next by Date: ipfilter ipv6 icmp woes
Previous by Thread: Re: SCRIPTS v FILES
Next by Thread: ipfilter ipv6 icmp woes
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index