Re: proplist [was: Importing xmlgrep into base]

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: proplist [was: Importing xmlgrep into base]
From: markucz%gmail.com@localhost
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:18:08 +0300

> Again: WE ALREADY HAVE A NON-BINARY ON-DISK FORMAT FOR PROPLIB.
Right. AND IT'S *NOT* QUITE XML ALTHOUGH IT LOOKS LIKE IT. As already
mentioned, there's no guarantee proplib will digest properly what a
fully conforming to the XML standard utility feeds it. If xmlgrep is not
imported into base, you can probably ignore this. If it is, then it's a
problem. IS IT NOW CLEAR?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: proplist [was: Importing xmlgrep into base]
  - From: Adam Hoka

References:
- Re: Importing xmlgrep into base
  - From: David Young
- re: Importing xmlgrep into base
  - From: matthew green
- Re: Importing xmlgrep into base
  - From: Martin S. Weber
- Re: proplist [was: Importing xmlgrep into base]
  - From: Matthew Mondor
- Re: proplist [was: Importing xmlgrep into base]
  - From: Nhat Minh Le
- Re: proplist [was: Importing xmlgrep into base]
  - From: Matthew Mondor
- Re: proplist [was: Importing xmlgrep into base]
  - From: markucz
- Re: proplist [was: Importing xmlgrep into base]
  - From: Adam Hoka

Prev by Date: Re: proplist [was: Importing xmlgrep into base]
Next by Date: Re: proplist [was: Importing xmlgrep into base]
Previous by Thread: Re: proplist [was: Importing xmlgrep into base]
Next by Thread: Re: proplist [was: Importing xmlgrep into base]
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index