tech-userlevel archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: silly behavior of factor(6)
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 08:16:09PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> And 1 has no prime factors either. That's great, but the whole point of
> this thread is to strike a balance between what's strictly meaningful and
> what makes the most ad hoc sense.
If there's no concensus then why not add an option to factor(6) for a
strictly mathematically correct mode vs. more predictable/easy to parse
output?
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- ghen%telenet.be@localhost -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam messages!
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index