Re: Rumpification (was Re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/envstat)

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>]

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:22:34AM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
> On Tue Dec 14 2010 at 14:22:50 +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> > 
> > So now someone adding code to any RUMPPRG'd program now needs to
> > effectively check each syscall individually to see if it needs a prog_
> > wrapper?
> 
> Yes.  It's not really a very difficult rule.  I can understand the "I
> forgot" vector, though.  I seriously doubt it'll be a problem, but just
> in case, see below.

I have to say, this is extraordinarily ugly.  Why can't you make a rump
libc instead that shims these symbols?

Thor