Re: Rumpification (was Re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/envstat)

[Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>]

On Dec 14, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Antti Kantee wrote:

> On Tue Dec 14 2010 at 13:25:25 -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
>>> Do you have an objection (apart from the one in the beginning of the
>>> mail where you indicated you don't like the new outlook of the code)?
>>> If not, consider it a fun experiment where you gain a ton of features
>>> for the cost of a bucket of paint.
>> 
>> We have now changes from having POSIX compliant sources to something
>> that isn't.  In your example it's a high VOC paint that causes cancer
>> in long term exposure.
> 
> Can you point out a specific case of where POSIX compliance has been
> lost due to my work?

if you require host_XXX instead of XXX, that's enough.  I should not
have to include something that translate host_XXX to XXX