tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: snprintf(3) and friends async-signal safety?

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: snprintf(3) and friends async-signal safety?
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 01:19:45 +0100

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 01:11:33AM +0100, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> Why mark SIGINFO without SA_RESTART? Reads may fail with EINTR.

Exactly. So you get faster back into the main loop.

Joerg

References:
- snprintf(3) and friends async-signal safety?
  - From: Jean-Yves Migeon
- Re: snprintf(3) and friends async-signal safety?
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: snprintf(3) and friends async-signal safety?
  - From: Jean-Yves Migeon
- Re: snprintf(3) and friends async-signal safety?
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: snprintf(3) and friends async-signal safety?
  - From: Jean-Yves Migeon

Prev by Date: Re: snprintf(3) and friends async-signal safety?
Next by Date: Re: snprintf(3) and friends async-signal safety?
Previous by Thread: Re: snprintf(3) and friends async-signal safety?
Next by Thread: mksh import
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index