tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: mksh import

To: Dad - Kent - <pobox0123%hotmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: mksh import
From: Alex Goncharov <alex-goncharov%comcast.net@localhost>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 22:16:30 -0500

,--- You/Kent (Tue, 4 Jan 2011 20:41:49 -0600) ----*
| Ksh93 has shown itself to be much more efficient than other shells.
| 
| IMO mksh is not on par with ksh93 in performance 

Any pointers to performance comparisons and/or test cases, for any
shells?

Thanks,

-- Alex -- alex-goncharov%comcast.net@localhost --

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mksh import
  - From: Dad - Kent -
- Re: mksh import
  - From: Dad - Kent -

References:
- mksh import
  - From: Adam Hamsik
- Re: mksh import
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: mksh import
  - From: Dad - Kent -

Prev by Date: Re: mksh import
Next by Date: Re: mksh import
Previous by Thread: Re: mksh import
Next by Thread: Re: mksh import
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index