Re: cp/mv and extended attributes preservation

[Simon Burge <simonb%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:

> ... But perhaps you were just
> suggesting that the function should move to a standalone src/bin/mv/utils.c 
> and have src/bin/cp/utils.c doing @ #include "../mv/utils.c" ?

This is what I meant (using .PATH in one makefile to pull in whatever.c
from the other directory).  That said, I wouldn't be against putting it
in a library.  Would libutil be more appropriate though?

Cheers,
Simon.