tech-userlevel archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Extended attributes and archives (tar, cpio, mpax, makefs...)
> sftp might be a bit more complicated,
It's a hell of a lot more complicated.
At least, unless scp is a lot more than just rcp over ssh, which is
what I thought it was, basically.
> but at least some an implementation PoV, scp is just crap.
So one particular implementation of it is crap. That's a reason to not
use that implementation. It is not a reason to throw out the protocol
baby with the implementation bathwater.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
- References:
- Extended attributes and archives (tar, cpio, mpax, makefs...)
- Re: Extended attributes and archives (tar, cpio, mpax, makefs...)
- Re: Extended attributes and archives (tar, cpio, mpax, makefs...)
- Re: Extended attributes and archives (tar, cpio, mpax, makefs...)
- Prev by Date:
Re: Extended attributes and archives (tar, cpio, mpax, makefs...)
- Next by Date:
Re: Extended attributes and archives (tar, cpio, mpax, makefs...)
- Previous by Thread:
Re: Extended attributes and archives (tar, cpio, mpax, makefs...)
- Next by Thread:
Re: Extended attributes and archives (tar, cpio, mpax, makefs...)
- Indexes:
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index