tech-userlevel archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: /bin/sh redirection in 'while' loop not closed afterwards?
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:47:29PM +0200, Anthony Mallet wrote:
> On Monday, at 22:23, David Laight wrote:
> | At a guess the fd for redirection usually get opened, duped above 10, then
> | duped to the required number very late on (in the child).
>
> Yes, exactly.
> The problem seems to appear around redir.c:144
>
> fcntl() returns EBADF, 'try' is incremented and the redirection is never
> registered in sv->renamed. Then popredir() does not undo it afterwards.
>
> With a simpler redirection like "ls 9</dev/null" fcntl does not return EBADF.
> So I'm not sure what's wrong.
>
> again:
> if ((i = fcntl(fd, F_DUPFD, 10)) == -1) {
> switch (errno) {
> case EBADF:
> if (!try) {
> openredirect(n, memory, flags);
> try++;
> goto again;
> }
> [...]
> }
> if (!try) {
> sv->renamed[fd] = i;
> close(fd);
> }
I don't think that loop should be used - it looks like it is there
for the case when all fd >= 10 are already in use.
Since you are seeing a leaked fd above 10, that fcntl() is where
it would come from.
Traditionally sh did redirects on buildins using fork - which is why any
shell variables they change get lost. Some shells (some ksh?) use the
same process (posix allows both), but I thought netbsd's /bin/sh
did fork.
I'd look at where sv->renamed[] gets read.
David
--
David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index