tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: getcontext()/setcontext()/makecontext() reliability?

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: getcontext()/setcontext()/makecontext() reliability?
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 23:26:36 -0400

On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 07:07:17PM -0500, David Young wrote:
> 
> In NetBSD, switching POSIX threads require, I thought, a user-kernel
> round trip.  I figure that's the costly part.

But more than one can run at the same time.  Not so with *context().

Thor

References:
- getcontext()/setcontext()/makecontext() reliability?
  - From: David Young
- Re: getcontext()/setcontext()/makecontext() reliability?
  - From: Matthew Mondor
- Re: getcontext()/setcontext()/makecontext() reliability?
  - From: David Young

Prev by Date: Re: getcontext()/setcontext()/makecontext() reliability?
Next by Date: Re: Common daemon models (was: getcontext()/setcontext()/makecontext() reliability?)
Previous by Thread: Re: getcontext()/setcontext()/makecontext() reliability?
Next by Thread: Re: Common daemon models (was: getcontext()/setcontext()/makecontext() reliability?)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index