Re: 16bit ctype table

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: 16bit ctype table
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:49:04 +0200

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:20:07AM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20120819204117.GA18087%britannica.bec.de@localhost>,
> Joerg Sonnenberger  <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >Hi all,
> >any objection to the attached patch? It extends the ctype table to 16bit
> >and proper masks for the various types. ABI compatibility is preserved.
> >
> 
> Looks good, but why CTYPE_B -> CTYPE_BL? Just curious?

Make sure that code using the old meaning breaks when getting
recompiled.

Joerg

References:
- 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Christos Zoulas

Prev by Date: Re: 16bit ctype table
Next by Date: Re: 16bit ctype table
Previous by Thread: Re: 16bit ctype table
Next by Thread: Re: 16bit ctype table
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index