Re: 16bit ctype table

[yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi)]

hi,

> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:56:37AM +0000, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> hi,
>> 
>> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:02:53AM +0900, Takehiko NOZAKI wrote:
>> >> we have to go with _CTYPE_* == _RUNETYPE_* ordering from the start.
>> > 
>> > Attached version would be doing that. I don't think it is really an
>> > improvement in this case though.
>> > 
>> > Joerg
>> 
>> does it mean it's now almost identical to tnozaki's version?
> 
> It is functionally equivalent, I think,

good to hear that after many months you guys are reaching a consensus.

> 
>> how do you think about BUILDCOLD/_COMPAT_BSDCTYPE?
> 
> I don't think it helps that much, what to remove is documented.

as there are many changes waiting for the major bump, it's desirable
to make the work necessary on bump minimal.

YAMAMOTO Takashi

> 
> Joerg