tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: 16bit ctype table

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: 16bit ctype table
From: Takehiko NOZAKI <takehiko.nozaki%gmail.com@localhost>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 03:56:25 +0900

> I still don't see the point in redefining the ctype stuff. Does it
> *really* break on any platform we care about?

if you think so, it is the matter. maybe only in your mind.
please clarify what are you warried about.

it is far away from ``technical'' discussion.
i'm getting sick of such uncertainty.

-- 
Takehiko NOZAKI<takehiko.nozaki%gmail.com@localhost>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

References:
- 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Takehiko NOZAKI
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Takehiko NOZAKI
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Takehiko NOZAKI
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: Re: 16bit ctype table
Next by Date: Re: 16bit ctype table
Previous by Thread: Re: 16bit ctype table
Next by Thread: Re: 16bit ctype table
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index