Re: dlopen() and libpthread

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: dlopen() and libpthread
From: Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:27:47 +0000

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:03:10AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Sounds like a completely messed up design... Seriously, something's
> seriously wrong with requiring a PAM module to require threads....

Right. But that has been working for years, and our correct design 
completely breaks the functionnality. 

One way to deal with the issue would be to let the administrator 
somehow set LD_PRELOAD for setuid binaries such as su or login, but how
could it be done?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu%netbsd.org@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: dlopen() and libpthread
  - From: David Holland
- Re: dlopen() and libpthread
  - From: Emmanuel Dreyfus

References:
- dlopen() and libpthread
  - From: Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: dlopen() and libpthread
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: dlopen() and libpthread
  - From: Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: dlopen() and libpthread
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: dlopen() and libpthread
  - From: Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: dlopen() and libpthread
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: Re: dlopen() and libpthread
Next by Date: Re: dlopen() and libpthread
Previous by Thread: Re: dlopen() and libpthread
Next by Thread: Re: dlopen() and libpthread
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index