On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Jochen Kunz wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:02:33 +0100 Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:What do you think?dnsmasq? I think dnsmasq would fit most peoples requirements as thoese requirements are typically quite simple. If you really need more complex things, well, there is still pkgsrc/net/bind*. I prefere simple, small things in base and to push the more complex things to pkgsrc. That's my color sugestion for the bikeshed. ;-)
I second this suggestions. A fullblown DNS server is not really necesssary for a run-of-the-mill machine.
-- David Griffith dgriffi%cs.csubak.edu@localhost A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?