tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case

To: Richard Hansen <rhansen%bbn.com@localhost>, tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
From: David Laight <david%l8s.co.uk@localhost>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:34:18 +0000

On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 11:00:27AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> 
> Might be worth looking at how it has been fixed in other versions of ash.
> Not sure I've got time until sunday week.

Raised as bin/47361.
Fixed (hopefully) by ref 1.88 of sh/expand.c

        David

-- 
David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost

References:
- bug in sh, probably, with test case
  - From: Greg Troxel
- Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
  - From: David Laight
- Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
  - From: Richard Hansen
- Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
  - From: David Laight
- Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
  - From: David Laight

Prev by Date: Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
Next by Date: ancient less, bug, git
Previous by Thread: Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
Next by Thread: Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index