Re: proplib and the jet age

[Marc Balmer <marc%msys.ch@localhost>]

Am 05.01.2013 um 14:54 schrieb Alexander Nasonov <alnsn%yandex.ru@localhost>:

> Marc Balmer wrote:
>> I don't even think proplib is that bad that it absolutely has to
>> be removed...  Every bad API can be improved, if needed..;)
> 
> I agree with this. I was even considering writing Lua bindings for proplib
> when Lua was accepted. One use case I had in mind was sending proplib from
> control tool to the kernel and receiving data from the kernel. But then I
> saw a statement that Lua shouldn't be used in such tools. This stopped me.

Who said that Lua should not be used in such tools, and, more important, why 
not?