tech-userlevel archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: [PATCH] libpthread NOLOAD removal
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost> wrote:
> it means that the representation of a locked mutex is incompatible
> between w/ and w/o libpthread. it contradicts the purpose of
> the patch, isn't it?
Yes, I now think that approach is not going to be successful. I posted
in another message today test cases where I dsiscovered it would break.
We can either decide to not support code sharing a mutex between code
using the libc stub and code using the libpthread implementation, or to
move almost all libpthread in libc.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index