tech-userlevel archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: A draft for a multibyte and multi-codepoint C string interface
>> The 16 bit restriction was a conscious decision, right? ISO 10646
>> was 31 bit from the very start. [...]
> Are there really people who want to switch to "Unicode" and not
> UTF-8, [...]?
Well, I don't know about `people', but I probably count. I think the
only sane way to do Unicode is to widen `char'.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index