Re: missing ELF-related constants

[enh <enh%google.com@localhost>]

at the risk of pushing my luck too far, could you add EM_AARCH64 (183,
0xb7)? the spec is here:
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0056b/IHI0056B_aaelf64.pdf

ARM suggested the comment

#define EM_AARCH64»       183»       /* AArch64 64-bit ARM microprocessor */

in 
https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/68314/2/libc/include/sys/exec_elf.h

thanks! (for the rand fixes too.)

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:00 PM, enh <enh%google.com@localhost> wrote:
> awesome! thank you!
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Matt Thomas 
> <matt%3am-software.com@localhost> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 28, 2013, at 2:23 PM, enh <enh%google.com@localhost> wrote:
>>
>>> i'm updating Android's C library to the current NetBSD exec_elf.h and
>>> notice that although the current version of exec_elf.h ($NetBSD:
>>> exec_elf.h,v 1.129 2013/09/10 16:24:02 matt Exp) includes DT_FLAGS,
>>> it's missing the DF_* constants described here for use with DT_FLAGS:
>>>
>>> http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch5.dynamic.html#dynamic_section
>>>
>>> (specifically, the Android linker refers to DF_SYMBOLIC and DF_TEXTREL.)
>>
>> Fixed.
>
>
>
> --
> Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/
> Java i18n/JNI/NIO, or bionic questions? Mail me/drop by/add me as a reviewer.



-- 
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/
Java i18n/JNI/NIO, or bionic questions? Mail me/drop by/add me as a reviewer.