Re: sed -u option

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On Jun 25, 10:31pm, yyamano%kt.rim.or.jp@localhost (Yuji Yamano) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: sed -u option

| On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:30:35 -0400, christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos 
Zoulas) wrote:
| 
| > Yes. Follow GNU. No point in making -u line-buffered, when we have -l for 
it!
| > Also what does 'u' stand for on OpenBSD? 'U'npredictable?
| 
| How about this patch?

Thanks, I've applied part of this patch already. You are bringing up
an interesting question: how to treat the input. We don't do the
anything for _IOLBF, so I guess we could just ignore it too for _IONBF.

Or we could always set the input buffering to match the output?
What do others think?

christos