tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: pidfile_lock(3)

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pidfile_lock(3)
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:13:01 +0100

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 02:10:57PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> It works correctly on NFS if you have the locking daemon setup? Besides,
> is there even a valid reason for using NFS for pidfiles? I would expect
> /var/run to be a minimal tmpfs in that kind of installations.

None of my (plenty) diskless machines does that - /var/run is not
performance critical, so why bother?

Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pidfile_lock(3)
  - From: Brett Lymn

References:
- pidfile_lock(3)
  - From: Roy Marples
- Re: pidfile_lock(3)
  - From: James K. Lowden
- Re: pidfile_lock(3)
  - From: Roy Marples
- Re: pidfile_lock(3)
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: pidfile_lock(3)
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: Re: pidfile_lock(3)
Next by Date: Re: pidfile_lock(3)
Previous by Thread: Re: pidfile_lock(3)
Next by Thread: Re: pidfile_lock(3)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index