Re: refine of the GSOC project

[Charles Cui <charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost>]

Sure, I can do it.
To make it clear, besides this list, you want another list that failed
the test because of it is not used in a standard way or compiler
settings?

2016-05-09 7:27 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas <christos%astron.com@localhost>:
> In article <CA+SXE9ucResOz3cBo0QzXUuh7vAe32EZKVSgBE7427OWXDS1wg%mail.gmail.com@localhost>,
> Charles Cui  <charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
>>Thanks guys for all your advices! I will try the methods proposed by
>>you guys and let you know once I have new results.
>>Right now, my way (install kernel and userland together) works (It
>>takes kernel and libc updates and generate expected results.)  This is
>>the updated list (much shorter than before) that I need to contribute
>>to. I have make an annotation for each feature. (freebsd) means
>>freebsd implements it, but we did not. (linux) means freebsd and
>>netbsd do not implement, but linux implements.
>
> Looks good. I would create either 2 lists or a table with 3 columns.
> These I presume are the failed to compile tests because of the missing
> features. It would be good to also have the failed to run tests (the
> ones where the feature is implemented but does not behave as the standards
> mandate). Can you please compile that too?
>
> Thanks,
>
> christos
>