Re: pthread library related

To: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>, Charles Cui <charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: pthread library related
From: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 15:28:09 -0400

On May 30,  8:29pm, martin%duskware.de@localhost (Martin Husemann) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: pthread library related

| Do we really need this? Why is it a function pointer?

It is the same as signal.

| > The third one is the missing kernel logic for _SC_SEM_NSEMS_MAX.
| 
| Why not use atomic_inc/atomic_dec for the p_nsem count (and a proper
| atomic-friendly type instead of uint)? Why limit the number at all?

Sure.

christos

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pthread library related
  - From: Charles Cui
- Re: pthread library related
  - From: Martin Husemann

References:
- Re: pthread library related
  - From: Martin Husemann

Prev by Date: Re: pthread library related
Next by Date: Re: pthread library related
Previous by Thread: Re: pthread library related
Next by Thread: Re: pthread library related
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index