Re: dirname(3) used on its own results?

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <20180926124258.GA14820%homeworld.netbsd.org@localhost>,
 <maya%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:32:03PM +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
>> Should you be allowed to call dirname(3) on the results of a previous
>> dirname(3) call?
>
>This is about minidlna, right? if it works, please feel free to add
>SSP_SUPPORTED= no
>to the makefile.
>
>it's a hack, but it'll give us the ability to continue discussing what
>the correct solution is without users being affected by it.

Well, it will return the wrong results... so might as well change the
memcpy to memmove? No?

christos